Legal Opinion

Wells v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1926No. 3 Div. 535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

Charge 2, refused to defendant, gives undue prominence to a part of the evidence, and for that reason was properly refused. Prince v. State, 100 Ala. 144, 14 So. 409, 46 Am. St. Rep. 28.

The court did not err in excluding the testimony of defendant’s witness Baker, that he had seen Det Brogden, a third person, with a bottle in which there was a corncob stopper, on the night of the alleged rape, and the testimony of defendant’s witness Odum, that a bottle with a corncob stopper was found at the house of the party alleged to have been ravished shortly after the alleged rape. There is nothing in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Chaney v. Burford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. West v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Tatum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. O'ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Alexander v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Lowrey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API