Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Morgan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2000No. 99-1545PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

We hold that the issuance of a three-day notice to vacate pursuant to R.C. 1923.04 does not terminate the obligations of the tenant to the landlord to pay rent for the remainder of the term or until a new tenant is secured in the exercise of reasonable diligence.

R.C. Chapter 1923 deals with forcible entry and detainer. Pursuant to R.C. 1923.02(A)(9), a forcible entry and detainer proceeding can be had against “tenants who have breached an obligation imposed upon them by a written rental agreement.” The statute empowers landlords to regain possession of their property upon a tenant’s breach of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cubbon v. LockerOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Briggs v. MacSwainOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Frenchtown Square Partnership v. Lemstone, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Chuang Dev. L.L.C. v. RainaOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. B & G Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Office Max, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Oldendick v. CrockerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Plaza Dev. Co. v. W. Cooper Ents., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API