Rouse v. Rouse

SWANN, Judge.

The husband, defendant in a divorce proceeding, takes this interlocutory appeal to challenge an “intermediate order” entered by the chancellor. Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.

No abuse of discretion having been clearly shown, the temporary awards of monthly support and maintenance, and fees for the wife’s attorney are affirmed.

We find error in the chancellor’s refusal to admit into evidence a separation agreement and amendment thereto on the grounds that the husband had failed to make a full disclosure of his assets to his wife.

This agreement between the parties…