Legal Opinion

Bowersock v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1917No. 172PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS.. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

Chapter 356 of the Laws of Kansas of 1903, General Statutes of 1909, §§ 4676 to 4683, is entitled and provides in part as follows:

“An Act requiring safeguards for the protection of all persons employed or laboring in manufacturing establishments, and providing civil remedies for all persons so engaged, or their personal representatives, in cases where any such person may be killed or injured while employed or laboring in any manufacturing establishment which is not properly provided with the safeguards required by this act.
“Sec: 4. All . . . machinery of every description used in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CastleSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Davis Oil Co. v. CloudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Holcombe v. CreamerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API