Legal Opinion

Stow v. Groton Savings Bank

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 22, 1937No. File #51579Published

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

The amended reply creates a departure from the original cause of action in that it has introduced material matter which not only fails to support but is in fact inconsistent with the complaint. No respectable system of pleading permits this for it tends to confusion. If the plain' tiff desires to change his position, ample means are available' through an amendment to his original complaint.

Although Swift states that a demurrer is the proper method of meeting departure and although this seems to be in con' formity with the weight of authority, this State has approved of a motion to strike as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Logiodice v. GannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API