Farncomb v. City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John H. Denison, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
In this action plaintiffs in error here, plaintiffs below, for themselves and others similarly situated, sought to have certain assessments against their properties declared null and void, and the City and County of Denver restrained from enforcing payment. The assessment alleged to be unlawful is that established by Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1913, of the City and County of Denver, for providing parks and parkways in the East Denver Park District. The ordinance sets out, as done, all the acts requisite to be done before the ordinance could be legally passed, and- prima facie shows compliance…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Harmon v. Auditor of Public AccountsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. RevenigSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Littlejohn v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Denver Land Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Gillum v. Town of RifleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Denver Land Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.