Brown v. City of Stuttgart
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentSteele Hays, Justice
Whatever else may be said of this agreement, the City of Stuttgart is not bound by it if, during any fiscal year, the city lacks the funds needed to meet its obligations under the lease. That, in my view, renders the agreement permissible under Act 508 of 1991 and conformable with Ark. Const, art. 12, § 4. Whether the arrangement more nearly resembles a sale than a lease need not concern us in the slightest, so long as its terms and conditions are within the bounds of the law.
It seems odd the majority would include a reference to Reuven Mark Bisk, State and Municipal Lease-Purchase…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. White Advertising InternationalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Commissioner of Revenues v. Dillard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955