Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Heightsman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Defendant appeals from a decree foreclosing a mechanic’s lien. It appears from the amended complaint and the notice of lien attached thereto that the plaintiff sold to the defendant a part of an old house located in Ontario and moved it to another lot where it was put upon a foundation constructed by the defendant. In the notice of lien it is stated that the “ ‘claimant’ did between the dates of February 17th, 1932, and March 21st, 1932, furnish material to and perform labor for Carrie E. Heightsman, at her special request, which said material and labor were used in the construction,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Allen v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Selden v. MeeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Janoe & Bushnell Construction, Inc. v. JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API