St. Louis World Publishing Co. v. Rialto Grain & Securities Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis. City Circuit Court. — How. O’Neill By an, Judge. This case comes within the provisions of chapter 3, section 17, of the 30th U. S. Statutes at Large, page 544, better known as the United States Bankruptcy Law of July 1, 1898, and amendments thereto of February 25, 1903. Under the provisions of this section, it was the duty of the lower court to stay further proceedings until a determination of the discharge' was. had in the . Federal Court, where a…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis. City Circuit Court. — How. O’Neill By an, Judge. This case comes within the provisions of chapter 3, section 17, of the 30th U. S. Statutes at Large, page 544, better known as the United States Bankruptcy Law of July 1, 1898, and amendments thereto of February 25, 1903. Under the provisions of this section, it was the duty of the lower court to stay further proceedings until a determination of the discharge' was. had in the . Federal Court, where a petition was, at that time, and still is, pending to have appellant adjudged bankrupt. In support of our contention, we…
1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.
— The respondent company obtained judgment before a justice of the peace against the Rialto Grain and Securities .Company for four hundred and fifty dollars. The judgment was for services rendered the last-named company by the respondent in printing photographs and publishing advertisements and was entered June 9, 1903. On the same day an appeal was granted to the St. Louis circuit court, the Rialto Grain and Securities Company having filed the requisite affidavit and an appeal bond with two sureties. - After reciting the appeal, the bond contained the usual clause of defeasance. At the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wolf v. StixSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Marx v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Knapp v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Goodman v. HermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Holloman v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- D. C. Wise Coal Co. v. Columbia Lead & Zinc Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Failor v. WeheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Texas Fidelity & Bonding Co. v. First State Bank of ChanningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- D. C. Wise Coal Co. v. Columbia Zinc & Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Muth Realty Co. v. TimmerbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.