State v. Meinke
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HENSAL, Judge.
{¶ 1} Nolan Meinke appeals his convictions for violating a protection order and domestic violence from the Elyria Municipal Court. This Court reverses.
I
{¶ 2} Mr. Meinke and D.G. had a romantic relationship beginning in 2008. They lived together and have a daughter. According to D.G., around the time of her pregnancy, Mr. Meinke developed a substance abuse problem and began acting violently. Although she ended their relationship, Mr. Meinke would not accept that it was over. He began following her, calling her, and texting her incessantly. D.G. testified that Mr. Meinke took…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. LauerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. AdkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. RustOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. NodalOhio Court of Appeals · 2024