Legal Opinion
Atlanta Finance Co. v. Brown
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 13, 1939No. 12614PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The sole question presented by the record for determination is whether or not the plaintiff in error, who is licensed under the act of 1904 (Ga. L. 1904, p. 79), codified as chapter 25-2 of the Code, is required, when purchasing or talcing an assignment of salary or wages, to conform to section 20 of the act of 1920 (Ga. L. 1920, p. 215, Code, § 25-319), with respect to giving notice as therein provided. While § 25-319, was enacted as a part' of the act of 1920, which act had to do mainly with the small-loan business, yet this section is general in its terms and unlimited…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Barnes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Kennedy v. MearaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Huff v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Emory v. Grand United Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Mitchell v. RingsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- In re TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1939
- Atlanta Finance Co. v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.