Legal Opinion

Stock v. Reynolds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari to Hillsdale; Chester, J. Attachment proceedings by Frederick W. Stock against Isaac N. Reynolds. Defendant brings certiorari to review the action of the circuit court in reversing an order of a commissioner dissolving the writ.

1Opinion of the CourtHookek, J.

The defendant was, during these proceedings, a grain dealer at Eaton Rapids, in the county of Eaton. The plaintiff resided in Hillsdale county. The plaintiff obtained a writ of attachment against the defendant from a justice of the peace in-Hillsdale county upon an affidavit alleging that “there is justly due to him from the defendant, upon implied contract, the sum of $150, * * * and that the said Isaac N. Reynolds, as deponent has good reason to believe, is about to remove his property from said county of Hillsdale, and refuses and neglects to pay or secure payment of this debt.” The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hyde v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Genesee County Savings Bank v. Michigan Barge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bane v. KeysMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Le Faivre v. Kess-line MotorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API