Legal Opinion

People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Feitner

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1902Published

Cebtioeabi to review an assessment for 1901 upon the capital stock of the relator the Spuyten Duyvil & Port Morris E. E. Co.

1Opinion of the CourtSteckler, J.

In this proceeding the relators seek to review an assessment upon the capital stock of the relator the Spuyten Duyvil & Port Morris Eailroad Company for the year 1901.

The said railroad company is a domestic corporation, and on the second Monday of January, 1901, its entire property consisted of a strip of railroad, together with the superstructure of railroad tracks and ties, along the northerly side of the Harlem Eiver, and certain buildings suitable for the operation of the road. The company had no surplus. The property is in the City of Hew York, within the jurisdiction of the defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. D., L. W.R.R. Co. v. . ClappNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. New York State v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. People Ex Rel. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. People Ex Rel. Equitable Gas Light Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. People ex rel. Powers v. KalbfleischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API