Legal Opinion
United States v. Archuleta
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2013No. 12-2026PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
A jury convicted Defendant Nathan Ar-chuleta of possession of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, Archuleta contends that admission of a gang expert’s testimony violated Federal Rules of Evidence 403, 702, and 704(b). Of the three evidentiary rules now cited, only Rule 408 was raised by Archuleta before the district court. As a result, our review of his arguments pertaining to Rule 702 and Rule 704(b) is limited to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Rodriguez-FelixCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Deshawn Lee Robinson A/K/A Leland Kirk, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Jeffrey Meekes A/K/A Orris Weathington, United States of America v. Keith Jackson A/K/A Kevin McElhannonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Racher v. Westlake Nursing Home Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Medina-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Eller v. Trans Union, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. KamaheleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.