Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Piper v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1989No. W88-437Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKing, Judge

I concur with the decision of the majority affirming the judgment of the trial court denying Insured Lloyds’ (hereinafter Lloyds) motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the third party de*9mand brought against it by Evangeline Cable Television, Inc. (hereinafter Evangeline).

I dissent from the decision of the majority which reverses the judgment of the trial court and now grants Lloyds’ motion for summary judgment and orders dismissal of the third party demand brought against it by Central Louisiana Electric Company (hereinafter Cleco). I believe that the trial judge was correct in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. HouchinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Brock v. Tidewater Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. State v. Placid Oil CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Succession of MarkhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API