Legal Opinion

Shiman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 5, 1932No. 168PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

In July, 1920, Shiman, the taxpayer, guaranteed four brokers’ accounts for his brother-in-law, Oppenheim, who was speculating in stocks. One of these was Oppenheim’s own,, one was Shiman’s, one belonged to Oppen-heim’s wife, in the fourth Shiman and others were interested. At the time of the guaranty Shiman thought Oppenheim solvent, as he was, and the transaction was of the ordinary kind, though influenced no doubt by the relationship of the two. Thereafter, Oppen-heim fell into financial straits and became insolvent, though he still retained a small salary susceptible…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eckert v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Avery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  3. New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil & Transport CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. Jones v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. Stephenson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Clark v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. American Cigar Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Stamos v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  5. Martin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API