Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Thomas

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 402.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. THOMAS. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Thomas,

2001-Ohio-1344.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. (No. 01-799—Submitted June 20, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 00-64. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} On August 14, 2000,…