Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bamerilease Capital Corp. v. Eugene E. Nearburg

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1992No. 90-3452Published

1ConcurrenceDavid A. Nelson, Circuit Judge

I agree that the judgment of the district court ought to be affirmed, and I agree with Judge Jones’ analysis of Texas law. The same result would obtain, in my view, under federal law.

I am uncertain whether the enforceability of the settlement agreement is dependent on state law or federal law. Diversity cases do sometimes present questions for which federal principles provide the rule of decision — see Edwards v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 690 F.2d 595, 598 n. 4 (6th Cir.1982), a diversity case where federal law was applied in deciding a judicial estoppel question — and this court has repeatedly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Kukla v. National Distillers Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Tomlin (J. Michael) v. Tsc Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Purex Corporation v. Willis Day Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API