Legal Opinion
Maeurer v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Motion for a bill of particulars.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Siclen, J.
Motion by plaintiff to compel the defendant to give bill of particulars of defense, alleging contributory negligence of the plaintiff, as set forth in defendant’s answer. There seems to be no dispute, and the fact is, that the plaintiff, when injured, was engaged in work, maritime in its nature; that at the time of the injury plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant and that heretofore the plaintiff made claim for and received compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of this state. After the decision of Knickerbocker Ice Company v. Stewart, 253 U. S. 149, the plaintiff brought…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffreySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Claim of Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maeurer v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921