Legal Opinion
Claim of Oppedisano v. Randall Electric, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Cardona, P. J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 23, 1999, which ruled that Randall Electric, Inc., was the sole employer of claimant.
Claimant, a journeyman electrician employed by Randall Electric, Inc., filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits based upon his exposure to chemicals and fumes while performing electrical maintenance and repairs at a manufacturing plant owned and operated by Buckbee-Mears Cortland (hereinafter BMC). After the claim was established, Randall sought an apportionment of liability based upon the theory that BMC was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Claim of Johnson v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Claim of Tunison v. P. C. Richards & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of Rosato v. Thunderbird Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Union Light & Power Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Claim of Dunn v. Landmark Flooring Concepts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Thomas S. v. Steel Style, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Colamaio-Kohl v. Task Essential Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.