Legal Opinion
Murray & Sorenson, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 23, 1953No. 4667_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered for the United States after trial without a jury of a suit brought for the recovery of forfeitures and double damages under the False Claims Statute, R. S. §§ 3490-3492, 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231-233, which, as embodied in the Code, is quoted in material part in the margin. 1 The essential evidentiary facts as found by the District Court, as to which there is no real dispute, can be briefly stated.
One Hanson 2 was employed just prior to and at least during the early months of the late war as a purchasing agent by two contractors who…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hutcheson v. Blackstone Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Blusal Meats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. North American Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.