Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Peterson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1958No. 5979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BRYANT, J.

The matter up for consideration at this time arises on a motion of defendants-appellees to strike the reply brief of appellant from the files for the reason that said reply brief has been filed out of rule. In support of this motion counsel for defendants-appellees rely upon Rule V, B, of the courts of appeals which provides as follows:

“Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or a Judge thereof, upon appeals on questions of law and fact, when all the testimony to be presented has been filed in the cause, the party having the burden of going forward shall within twenty (20)…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Levin v. BourneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. McGinnis v. KinkaidOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Boyd v. WatsonClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API