Legal Opinion

Pope v. Sun Cab Co.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 1985No. 789, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GETTY, Judge.

This appeal raises two questions; one substantive, one procedural. The substantive question is whether the court below erred in deciding that Md.Ann.Code art. 48A, § 538(b) (1979) excuses taxicabs from carrying the uninsured motorists insurance that would otherwise be required by Md.Ann. Code Art. 48A, § 541(c) (1979, 1984 Cum.Supp.). The procedural question is whether the trial court erred in deciding the substantive question in the course of a demurrer and Show Cause Order rather than in a pending declaratory judgment action.

Three cases, all from the Circuit Court for Baltimore…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Hunt v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Slate v. ZitomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Hamilton v. McAuliffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Utt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Alpert v. Le'Lisa CondominiumCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API