Herzig v. Hunkin Conkey Construction Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By PHILLIPS, J.
Plaintiffs, alleged residents and taxpayers of the city of Cleveland, a municipal corporation, brought this action in *314the lower court on behalf of the city and all taxpayers of the city of Cleveland to recover from defendant, The Hunkin-Conkey Construction Company, a corporation, money paid to that company from city funds under a long before completed allegedly illegal contract with the city for the erection of a pump house, administration building and exterior wall surrounding and adjoining the Parma Reservoir in the City Parma a part of the water system of the City of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Scott Township School District Authority v. Branna Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Reckman v. KeiterOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
- Yoskey v. Eric Petroleum Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Maloney v. Dayton Osteopathic HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
- Barga v. LongfellowOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.