Legal Opinion

Herzig v. Hunkin Conkey Construction Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1941No. 18207PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By PHILLIPS, J.

Plaintiffs, alleged residents and taxpayers of the city of Cleveland, a municipal corporation, brought this action in *314the lower court on behalf of the city and all taxpayers of the city of Cleveland to recover from defendant, The Hunkin-Conkey Construction Company, a corporation, money paid to that company from city funds under a long before completed allegedly illegal contract with the city for the erection of a pump house, administration building and exterior wall surrounding and adjoining the Parma Reservoir in the City Parma a part of the water system of the City of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott Township School District Authority v. Branna Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Reckman v. KeiterOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Yoskey v. Eric Petroleum Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Maloney v. Dayton Osteopathic HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Barga v. LongfellowOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API