Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

182 N.J. Super. 616 (1982)

442 A.2d 1072

ANITA HILL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ROBERT HILL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 8, 1981.

Decided February 9, 1982.

Before Judges MATTHEWS, PRESSLER and PETRELLA.

W. Marshall Prettyman argued the cause for the appellant (Sydney N. Lane, Essex-Newark Legal Services, attorney).

Peter Rosen argued the cause for the respondent (Rosen & Garodnick, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

This is a companion appeal to Mahoney v. Mahoney, 182 N.J. Super. 598, decided this day. It raises…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Mahoney v. MahoneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. MahoneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Pratt v. Pratt, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API