State v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Pretrial Discovery
Defendant assigns as error that material information was unconstitutionally withheld that would have been of material benefit to her defense. She incorporates by reference a similar, but more fully developed argument made in the defendant’s brief to this Court in State v. Kelly, 118 N.C. App. 589, 456 S.E.2d 861 (1995). N.C.R. App. P. 28(f) (1995). Generally, defendant contends that the United States Supreme Court’s holdings in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963) and Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 94 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1987) were…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re ButtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- United States v. Desmond RouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- In Re ButtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.