Legal Opinion

State v. Dustin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 14, 1982No. 81-182Published

1Opinion of the Court

122 N.H. 544 (1982)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

v.

FRANK W. DUSTIN

No. 81-182.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

June 14, 1982.

Gregory H. Smith, attorney general (Michael A. Pignatelli, assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State.

Brown & Nixon P.A., of Manchester (David W. Hess on the brief and orally), for the defendant.

BOIS, J.

The defendant appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of criminal restraint under RSA 633:2. He focuses his challenge on the trial court's decision to permit certain allegedly prejudicial statements and questions by the prosecution. We affirm his…

Also in this document: Dissent · Douglas; Dissent · Brock.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. RuelkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API