Legal Opinion
Conklin v. Haryman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1956No. Civ. 8736PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
This is a judgment roll appeal from a decree establishing heirship and determining the parties’ respective interests in the estate of Wells Conklin, deceased.
The decedent’s holographic will, which was admitted to probate, provides:
“Newville Glenn Co California
Jan 26 1897
“I hereby will devise and bequeath to my Brothers M. L. Conklin, G. W. Conklin, and A. Conklin all of my property at the time of my death. I appoint the eldest of my brothers living Executor of this my last and only will without bonds. I recognize my sister Mrs. J. F. Harryman to whome I give one dollar $1.00(s) Wells Conklin”
T…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. BabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Estate of MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Layous v. Monterey County Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Mockbee v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of NewmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Estate of HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Long v. McJimseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Union Bank v. Sec. Pac. Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.