Legal Opinion

Pembrook v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1930No. 27088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, District Judge.

The plaintiff in error, designated hereafter as defendant, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced. Of the numerous errors presented in the petition in error, defendant relies on and discusses only four in his brief, namely, insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, excessive sentence, overruling of motion to quash, and the filing of the amended information.

This is the second appearance of this cause here, in that a previous conviction of the defendant for second degree murder was reversed and cause remanded for new trial. See Pembrook v. State, 117 Neb.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pembrook v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Clarence v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. State v. HutterNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Macomber v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. StockNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API