Legal Opinion
Terence C. Davis v. General Atomics, et al.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 14, 2025No. 2:25-cv-09430Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 TERENCE C. DAVIS, Case No. 2:25-cv-09430-WLH-JDE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 v. 13 GENERAL ATOMICS, ET AL., 14 15 Defendants. 16 The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff Terence D. 17 Davis (“Plaintiff”), to show cause in writing no later than December 5, 2025, 18 why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice as barred by res 19 judicata (claim preclusion) and collateral estoppel (issue preclusion). 20 On October 1, 2025, Plaintiff, a California resident proceeding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Anthony J. English v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Santos v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1984