Legal Opinion

City of Halstead v. Mayfield

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 30, 1993No. 69,313PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J.:

William K. Mayfield appeals four convictions of violations of Halstead city ordinances. Prior to sentencing by the municipal court, Mayfield appealed to the district court which, after a trial de novo, found Mayfield guilty and sentenced him.

Defendant argues the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear his appeal because it was filed prematurely.

We agree and reverse and remand.

K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 22-3609(1) provides that a defendant may appeal from municipal court to district court any judgment finding defendant guilty of a violation of a city ordinance.

As a general proposition,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  3. City of Kansas City v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RemlingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. City of Salina v. AmadorSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. State v. GillenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API