Legal Opinion

Hurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 27, 1985No. 84-1575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Judge.

Hurst appeals from his sentences received for two counts of burglary and one count of grand theft. He argues that his burglary sentences are improper under the Guidelines, pursuant to the committee note to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(12) in effect at the time the crimes were committed. We agree.

In this ease the trial court imposed the following concurrent1 sentences on the defendant:

1. Burglary2 — 3½ years incarceration, followed by a period of ten years probation.

2. Grand theft second degree — 3V2 years incarceration.

3. Burglary3 — 3V2 years incarceration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Joyce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. HurstSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Tisdale v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API