Legal Opinion

Basile v. The Los Angeles Film School, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 17, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00108Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Constantino Basile, 2:24-cv-00108-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff(s), 5 vs. Order 6 The Los Angeles Film School, LLC, et al, 7 Defendant(s). 8 Pending before the Court are pro se plaintiff Constantino Basile’s Motion For Reconsideration 9 (ECF No. 78) and Motion To Compel With Service Of Process (“Motion to Compel”) (ECF No. 79). The 10 Motion for Reconsideration is denied as moot. The Motion to Compel is also denied. 11 DISCUSSION 12 I. Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 78) 13 On April 30, 2024, plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel (ECF No. 73),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Martin v. Applied Cellular Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Ana Josefina Gonzalez Turul v. Rogatol Distributors, Inc., Belisario Araujo and Guillermo AraujoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Campbell v. GasperDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API