Legal Opinion

Grassi v. Loweth

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from in any way interfering with the plaintiffs’ use of a certain right of way leading to a garage owned by the plaintiffs.

The case was submitted upon an agreed state of facts. The only question of law presented is whether a husband, who enjoys an estate by the entirety, may, in the absence of any legal consent of the wife, subject the property to an easement, in the nature of a right of way. That he may not legally do this seems to be definitely established by the following authorities: Hiles v. Fisher (144 N. Y. 306); Grosser v. City of Rochester…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Quigley v. MonseesNew York Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. Westfall, New York County Courts1961
  2. Fine v. ScheinhausNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API