Martinez v. Pearson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CLAYTON, Justice.
Plaintiffs (appellants) herein filed suit against defendants (appellees) Ray Pearson as Independent Executor of the Estate of Louis Bailinas, deceased, and the heirs of the decedent, alleging that the decedent and his wife, Isabel D. Bailinas, who predeceased him, had entered into a parol contract whereby each spouse would devise to *77the other all property of each, and the surviving spouse would devise the remainder of all property of the couple to the plaintiffs, with the exception of small bequests to the defendant heirs. The couple executed simultaneous and mutual wills…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Nye v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Frazier v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Murphy v. SlatonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Magids v. AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., MIAMI, FLA.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
- Kronenberger v. BekeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974