Legal Opinion

France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 2, 2015No. Case No. 12-cv-04967-WHOPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY

Re: Dkt. Nos. 351, 353, 354

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge

INTRODUCTION

A jury found defendant Marvell Semiconductor liable for direct infringement of plaintiff France Telecom’s U.S. patent 5,446,747 (the “ ’747 patent”) and awarded France Telecom $1.7 million in damages. The jury also found Marvell Semiconductor not liable for contributory infringement, inducing infringement, or willful infringement, and rejected Marvell…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  2. Sycamore Ip Holdings LLC v. At & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
  3. Finjan, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. Bowden v. Genie Industries Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  5. ICTSI Oregon, Inc. v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) and International and Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 8District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API