Legal Opinion
United States v. Wright
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 18, 1994No. Crim. A. 91-385PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
After a jury trial, defendant Neal Wright (“Wright”) was convicted on both counts of a two count indictment. Currently before the court is Wright’s motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(c) or, in the alternative, for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. Also before the court is Wright’s motion for resentencing pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(c). 1 For the reasons set forth below, Wright’s post-trial motions are denied.
Facts
On 14 August 1991, the Grand Jury returned a two-count indictment (the “Indictment”) charging Wright and…
2Cases cited150 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Terry P. Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Benoit v. BockDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Roll v. BowersoxDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.