Legal Opinion

Rolfes v. O'CONNOR

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1992No. 92CA0493PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

Plaintiff, George A. Rolfes, commenced this litigation to obtain a court order requiring defendant, Ruth O’Connor, as the present holder of a promissory note secured by two deeds of trust executed by plaintiff, to release certain property from the encumbrance of one of those deeds of trust in accordance with that instrument’s provisions for partial releases. He also sought an order setting aside the foreclosure proceedings that were completed during the pendency of the litigation. The trial court entered summary judgment, dismissing both of plaintiff’s claims, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harada v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Vawter v. CraftsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Sacramento Suburan Fruit Lands Co. v. WhaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Scientific Packages, Inc. v. GwinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  5. Coppom v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guardian Title Agency, LLC v. Matrix Capital BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  2. Eisenhart v. SchreimannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In Re Clancy & Co. Construction, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1997
  4. Clark v. ScenaColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Simonson v. Z Cranbury AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API