Legal Opinion

Conard v. Bare

Miami Circuit Court

Decided April 15, 1904Published

1Opinion of the CourtDustin, J.

October 9, 1903, plaintiff and defendant executed the following:

“This agreement entered into this ninth day of October, 1903, between William H. Conard and Almira Bare, both of Miami county, Ohio, witnesseth:
“That whereas said parties have heretofore on or about February 15, 1903, entered into a contract of marriage, and on or about September 19, 1903, said Almira Bare did notify said William H. Conard that she refused to carry out said contract of marriage with him, by reason of which said William H. Conard claims to be injured in his feelings and property, etc., and the parties hereto…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frost v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API