Legal Opinion

State v. Cote

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 5, 1948No. 3797Published

1Opinion

On motion eor rehearing. After the foregoing opinion was filed, the defendants moved for rehearing. The plaintiff requested that in disposing of the motion, the court “clarify” the moaning of the last paragraph of the opinion, as applied to a motion filed by the defendant Cote in the Superior Court in the equity action, seeking to enjoin the plaintiff from taking depositions in that action pursuant to notices given after the opinion in this case was filed.

Duncan, J.

The concluding paragraph of the opinion is not controlling of questions raised by the defendant’s motion. It relates to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Owen v. WestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  2. Lacoss v. LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  3. White Mountain Freezer Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  4. Glover v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  5. Brown v. BarnardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API