Legal Opinion
Lima Lucero v. Parkinson Construction Company, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 4, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-0515Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELISEO LIMA LUCERO, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-515 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 71, 73 : PARKINSON CONSTRUCTION : COMPANY, INC., et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions. See Supp. Mot. Atty’s’ Fees (“May 3 Mot.”), ECF No. 71.; Mot. Sanctions, ECF No. 73. 1 Plaintiff asks the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.