Legal Opinion

Kopke v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1954No. 39,366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an action by the named beneficiary to recover on a group life insurance policy. Judgment was in favor of plaintiff, and defendant insurance company has appealed.

The evidence disclosed substantially the following facts:

In July 1943 defendant company issued its group life insurance policy covering employees of the Consolidated Flour Mills Company (hereinafter referred to as Consolidated). Among these employees was one Kopke, who was manager of Consolidated’s elevator at Pawnee Rock, and the policy in question in the amount of $2,500 was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Turley v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Armstrong v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company of Boston, Massachusetts v. R. H. Bennett, Administrator of the Estate of Albert H. Steele, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API