Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. Cox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1978No. 7721SC366PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant raises two primary questions for this Court: (1) Was judgment by default properly entered? (2) If so, should that judgment be set aside under Rule 60(b)?

Defendant advances four arguments to support his contention that judgment by default was erroneously entered. We will address each argument separately.

First, defendant asserts that the clerk’s entry of default was improper in that no written application for entry of default was made. Rule 55(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment ... is sought has failed to plead . . .…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Bimac Corp. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Graham v. University Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Silverman v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Sawyer v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API