Legal Opinion

Jackson v. K-Mart Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 27, 1992No. 66,742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

Brigitte Jackson appeals from an order granting K-Mart Corporation summary judgment in this slip-and-fall tort action. She contends that the court erred in holding she was required to prove K-Mart had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition on the premises. We reverse and remand for trial.

Brigitte Jackson entered the K-Mart department store located in Manhattan, Kansas, as a business invitee for the purpose of shopping for children’s clothing. While walking down an aisle in the children’s clothing department, she slipped and fell near a round clothing rack. In the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wollerman v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  3. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Patterson v. BrouhardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Kimes v. Unified School District No. 480District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  3. Napell v. Aten Department Store, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  4. Jackson v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API