Legal Opinion

Batista v. Kelly

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 7, 1994No. 92-CV-784HPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct any and all further proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Pending for decision is defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the case against them. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are not in dispute. On June 21, 1992, while he was confined at the Attica Correctional Facility, plaintiff received an inmate misbehavior report written by Corrections Officer…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rasheen v. AdnerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
  2. Barclay v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
  3. Batista v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API