Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McGhee v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided April 20, 1994No. 91-1595Published

1ConcurrenceSteinberg, Judge

I have voted against en bane consideration because the case does not meet the Court’s criteria for en banc consideration, although, for the reasons stated below, I do not agree with the Court’s opinion in this case. See Internal Operating Procedures, V.(b) (“En banc consideration, or review of a panel decision en banc, is not favored and will be ordered where it is necessary to secure or maintain a uniformity of decision among panels, where the case involves a question of exceptional importance, or in other unusual circumstances.”); Mata v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 276 (1993) (per curiam order). I…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  3. EF v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  4. Fugo v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  5. Rosler v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API