Legal Opinion

Xerographic Supplies Corp. v. Hertz Commercial

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 29, 1980No. 79-1099PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

386 So.2d 299 (1980)

XEROGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

HERTZ COMMERCIAL LEASING CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 79-1099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 29, 1980.

Highsmith & Strauss and Philip Glatzer, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.

NESBITT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a cross-claim for indemnity in an action arising out of contracts to sell, finance, and lease a copy machine.

Appellant (Xerographic) entered into a contract for the sale of the copier with Mr. Kenworthy.[1] The…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. H.B. Fuller Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Kinetic Systems, Inc., a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Rudy's Glass Const. Co. v. EF Johnson Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Cooper v. RepublicBank Garland, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  5. Interfase Marketing, Inc. v. Pioneer Technologies Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API