Tiner v. Christian
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL PROM ASIILEY CIRCUIT COURT. Hon. Henry B. Morse, Circuit Judge. First. The court below erred in not allowing attorney’s fees as legitimate costs of administration ; See Secs. 194-5-6, Chap. 4, Gould’s Dig. That the court should have considered the question of attorney’s fees; See Sec. 201, Chap. 4, Gould’s Dig. As to*the matter of bill of exceptions : See Dempsy vs. Fenno, 16 Ark., 491. Second.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM ASIILEY CIRCUIT COURT. Hon. Henry B. Morse, Circuit Judge. First. The court below erred in not allowing attorney’s fees as legitimate costs of administration ; See Secs. 194-5-6, Chap. 4, Gould’s Dig. That the court should have considered the question of attorney’s fees; See Sec. 201, Chap. 4, Gould’s Dig. As to*the matter of bill of exceptions : See Dempsy vs. Fenno, 16 Ark., 491. Second. That the widow was entitled to dower in the lands, under Sec. 1, Chap. 60, Gould’s Dig., and she could “ follow-it wherever it might he found, and subject it to her lien.” FLUI ad’r., vs.…
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, J.
Mary K. Christian, as administratrix of •Joseph D. Christian, deceased, surviving partner of Christian & Norris, filed in the Circuit Court of Ashley county, at its ■September term, 1869, her petition against Benjamin Tiner, .as“administrator of A. J. Buffington. The facts, a^ stated in the said petition, were agreed to by the attorneys, which were substantially as follows:
“That Tiner, as administrator of Buffington, under an order of the Court of Probate, of Ashley county, sold certain lands belonging to the estate of said Buffington, in Ashley •county, for $700 00 which sale was reported…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. TapscottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Fowler v. FrazierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Choate v. O'NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Luke v. RhodesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.