Legal Opinion

Joy Global, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (In Re Joy Global, Inc.)

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 12, 2007No. Civ. 01-039-LPSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STARK, United States Magistrate Judge.

This bankruptcy case has a lengthy history, having already endured more than seven years of litigation in Bankruptcy Court, District Court, and the Court of Appeals. In this Court alone, four different judges have handled the case. Presently pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Joy Global, Inc. (“Joy”). Notwithstanding Joy’s understandable desire to bring this case to a conclusion, Joy’s motion will be denied for the reasons set forth below.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1

1.The Parties

Plaintiff Joy is the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, in No. 93-5208 v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation in No. 93-5233. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Michael Kopec v. Tyrone Tate, Officer Township of WhitemarshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies", ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) in No. 95-3432. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriters's at Lloyd's of London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies." ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) Koppers Company, Inc., in No. 95-3461Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Genetic Technologies Ltd. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  2. James Cable, LLC v. Millennium Digital Media Systems, L.L.C. (In Re Broadstripe, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  3. Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Joy Global, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  5. MARINA GROUP LLC v. SHIRLEY MAY INTERNATIONAL US INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API