Legal Opinion

Brown v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1967Published

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The Clerk’s first order (ex parte) authorized the plaintiff to examine the individual defendants and two others with respect to the matters set forth in the rather long and detailed petition. After hearing, on the defendants’ motion the Clerk entered a second order vacating, in toto, the order for examination. On appeal, Judge Brock sustained the Clerk’s second order but remanded the cause to the Clerk with leave granted to the plaintiff “to file an amended application,” if so advised. The plaintiff elected to appeal rather than to amend his application.

Implicit in Judge Brock’s order is his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griners' & Shaw, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Cates ex rel. Borland v. Griffith Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Nance v. Gilmore Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API